Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference ―Science, Technology and Art in Global Context‖ (December 12-14, 2025) / Publisher website: www.naukainfo.com. – Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2025. – 190 p.

147 At the same time, globalization can turn cultural diversity into a resource that is exploited unevenly. This is manifested in the phenomenon of epistemic neocolonialism: when data collected in local communities are used in large international studies, but the communities themselves receive neither authorship recognition, nor access to the results, nor financial support. In such cases, the ―center‖ generates theory, and the ―periphery‖ supplies empirical material. This leads to the systematic invisibility of local researchers in the global scientific field. Overcoming these challenges requires systemic solutions. Multilingual publishing platforms, inclusive open science initiatives, support for regional journals, and partnership models that provide for equitable sharing of authorship and resources are needed. Developing ethical protocols for collaboration with local communities is another key tool to prevent unethical use of knowledge and data. In conclusion, cultural, conceptual, and theoretical diversity is not only a condition for the stable development of global science, but also a catalyst for the emergence of new research paradigms. Its preservation and support are necessary prerequisites for globalization not to become a process of unification, but to turn into a mutual enrichment of traditions, methods, and scientific cultures. REFERENCES: 1. Habermas Y. Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Kyiv: Parapan, 2010 2. Latour B. We were never modern. Kyiv: Nika-Center, 2018. 3. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Kyiv: Port-Royal, 2002. 4. Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Research. Kyiv: Osnovy, 1995. 5. Foucault M. Archaeology of Knowledge. Lviv: Litopys, 1996. 6. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001. 7. Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.