Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference ―Science, Technology and Culture: From Tradition to Digital Future‖ (December 8-10, 2025) / Publisher website: www.naukainfo.com. – Vienna, Austria, 2025. – 183 p.

159 - evaluates stability of coherent states in social interaction. This method shows how coherence gives rise to new relational practices [15]. 4.7. Ecosystemic Inquiry This level examines: - transformation of group dynamics; - formation of collective sensitivity; - co-creation of meaning; - reciprocal shaping of individual, community, and environment. It allows coherence to be studied as a socio-ecological process [15, 17]. 4.8. Integrated Methodological Architecture The methods form a unified whole: - phenomenology → inner experience [1, 2]; - embodied observation → behavioural markers [3, 9]; - ecological ethnography → environment [4, 5]; - narratives → meaning [16, 17]; - action research → transformation [15]; - ecosystemic inquiry → collective dynamics [15, 17]. Together they allow the coherent state to be studied as an internal, external, and relational system simultaneously. SECTION 5. RESULTS AND KEY OBSERVATIONS 5. Results of Pilot Implementation and Key Observations The pilot application of the Coherent State Model within a natural educational environment provided early empirical indicators of how human state, embodiment, awareness, and environment mutually shape one another. These findings are not framed as ―effectiveness outcomes‖ but as emergent markers of how the model operates in real-life conditions. 5.1. Changes in Internal Regulation of Learners Analysis of daily observations and child self-reports demonstrated: - greater bodily awareness and clearer identification of internal signals;