Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference ―Synergy of Modern Science and Education‖ (February 2-4, 2026) / Publisher website: www.naukainfo.com. – New York, USA, 2026. - 324 p.
166 СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ: 1. Lenarz, T. Cochlear Implant—State of the art. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2017, 96, S123–S151. 2. Pisoni, D.B.; Kronenberger, W.G.; Harris, M.S.; Moberly, A.C. Three challenges for future research on cochlear implants. World J. Otorhinolaryngol. - Head Neck Surg. 2017, 3, 240–254. 3. Hoppe, U.; Hocke, T.; Hast, A.; Iro, H. Maximum preimplantation monosyllabic score as predictor of cochlear implant outcome. HNO 2019, 67, 62–68. 4. Hoppe, U.; Hocke, T.; Hast, A.; Iro, H. Cochlear implantation in candidates with moderate-to-severe hearing loss and poor speech perception. Laryngoscope 2020, 131, E940–E945. 5. Blamey, P.; Artieres, F.; Başkent, D.; Bergeron, F.; Beynon, A.; Burke, E.; Dillier, N.; Dowell, R.; Fraysse, B.; Gallégo, S.; et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: An update with 2251 patients. Audiol. Neurotol. 2012, 18, 36–47. 6. Kutschmann, M.; Bender, R.; Grouven, U.; Berg, G. Aspects of sample size determination and power calculation illustrated on examples from rehabilitation research. Rehabilitation 2006, 45, 377–384.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTAxMzIwNA==