Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference ―Science, Technology and Culture: Interaction, Evolution and Progress‖ (December 21-23, 2025) / Publisher website: www.naukainfo.com. – Copenhagen, Denmark, 2026. – 161 p.

132 highly structured formats with specific sections conveying distinct information types. Translators must maintain these organizational conventions while ensuring that timelines, locations, and task assignments remain unambiguous. The standard five- paragraph field order format used in many NATO militaries provides a structural framework that facilitates translation but requires intimate familiarity with each component‘s function. Given the high stakes of military translation, robust quality assurance mechanisms prove essential. Back-translation, where translated texts are translated back into the source language by independent translators, helps identify discrepancies and ambiguities. Subject matter expert review ensures that translated texts accurately convey operational and technical content, catching errors that linguistically competent translators without military expertise might overlook. Standardization efforts aim to enhance interoperability and reduce translation variability. NATO‘s Standardization Office develops standardized terminology across alliance languages, facilitating coalition operations. Similarly, the European Defence Agency promotes terminological harmonization among EU member states. However, perfect standardization remains elusive given the dynamic nature of military affairs and the distinct linguistic structures of member nations‘ languages. Translation memory systems and computer-assisted translation (CAT) tools increasingly support military translation, enabling consistency across large documentation sets and facilitating terminology management. However, these technologies require careful implementation. Military documents often contain sensitive information requiring secure translation environments, and machine translation quality for specialized military terminology remains variable, necessitating extensive human review. The translation of NATO documents illustrates both achievements and ongoing challenges in multilingual military cooperation. NATO‘s bilingual framework (English and French as official languages) requires constant translation and interpretation. Terms like graduated response or collective defense have achieved