Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference ―Science at the Frontier of Progress‖ (January 27-29, 2026) / Publisher website: www.naukainfo.com. – Paris, France, 2026. - 302 p.

250 been additionally identified to understand performance as an alternative form of knowledge production in the minds of late modernity and digital culture. Results and discussion. Late modernity stands as a specific cultural and philosophical state, within which there is a radical transformation of forms of knowledge, knowledge and self-reflection. Instead of classical modernity, oriented on the idea of rationality, progress and stable semantic structures, late modernity is characterized by a crisis of universal narratives, fragmentation of the social space and the insignificance of identities. In these minds, it is not only social reality that is changing, but also the methods of philosophical comprehension. Mystery, in short, takes on the function of representing the ―objective‖ world and is more oriented towards the idea, process and situation in interaction [11; 7]. The key for the philosophical analysis of performative mystique is the category of performativity. In broad philosophical terms, performativity means the ability to not only represent reality, but to produce it. The performative act does not describe the already existing state of speeches, but creates a new situation, between which meanings, meanings and forms appear. In the late-modern context, performativity takes on an ontological dimension, while more cultural and social processes function as sub-structures without a predetermined meaning. In this sense, performance is considered not as an illustration of a philosophical idea, but as the very form of its creation. Sensation in a performative act does not convey action, but arises from the process of larynx. This approach allows for a new understanding of truth, knowledge and identity as procedural, contextually understood phenomena that are not reduced to stable conceptual structures [1; 4 ]. The performative mystique of late modernity forms a specific type of philosophical evidence, which is based not on distant observation, but on the direct participation of experience. In contrast to the classical forms of philosophical knowledge, which appeal to rational analysis, performance actualizes presence, bodily irritation and affective reaction. In this context, philosophical evidence stands as a concept that is experienced, and not as an abstract system to understand [6; 9].